1 Criticism of the National Health Service (England)
angelita40411 edited this page 4 months ago


Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes issues such as access, waiting lists, healthcare coverage, and numerous scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the publicly funded healthcare system of England, created under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour federal government of Clement Attlee. It has come under much criticism, particularly during the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the participation of the NHS in scandals extends back several years, including over the arrangement of mental health care in the 1970s and 1980s (eventually part of the factor for the Mental Health Act 1983), and overspends on healthcare facility newbuilds, consisting of Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the cost of which soared from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]
Access controls and waiting lists

In making health care a mainly "invisible cost" to the client, health care appears to be effectively totally free to its consumers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To reduce costs and ensure that everybody is treated equitably, there are a range of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) works as a main gatekeeper - without a referral from a GP, it is often difficult to get greater courses of treatment, such as a visit with a consultant. These are argued to be necessary - Welshman Bevan noted in a 1948 speech in your house of Commons, "we shall never ever have all we need ... expectations will constantly surpass capacity". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide medical insurance systems in other countries (e.g. Germany) have actually ignored the need for recommendation